I received an email saying there was a comment in moderation on the site, so i headed down to a friends house to look more into it as the initial comment looked good.
“Monkey” made a very good point about WikiLeaks releasing scientology documents. While I applaud wikileaks for taking a stand against scientology, i beleive that the way they are currently doing it is damaging to our cause. Before you call me a Scientology plant ect, please, read my post on enturbulation:
http://forums.enturbulation.org/7-general-discussion/thought-wikileaks-9324/#post167204
A guy named Monkey posted a comment on my site today, and I think it’s worth mentioning for those who are releasing dox to WikiLeaks (and if wikileaks themselves see this).Quote:
Guys, start releasing lower level stuff - this is more dramatic, but people who are “in” won’t be able to identify with it. Give them what they will learn when they’re newbies, so they can see that what you’re saying is true. posted @ http://www.itsoverninethousand.com/s…#comment-55275
I beleive this is a good idea. Once again lets go back to what mark bunker said. Talk to a scilon about xenu, and chances are they just say “WTF?”.
If they have yet to reach a level where they have yet to understand whats going on in these dox, then we should start releasing lower-level dox.
A way to propose this would be to re-categorize everything, or prefix a name with:
PRECLEAR
CLEAR
OT1 - OT8
MISC (where financial records/criminal court cases ect go)This way those who just joined, or are still very low in scientology can at least find something relevent to their level, and make decisions. Otherwise they are just going to look at one document, not understand anything, and just stop reading.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | ||||||